golazzy

About

About golazzy

One narrow job: take a health goal, put the options side by side, and be specific about where the money comes from.

The premise

Supplement shopping goes wrong in a predictable sequence. You land on a page built by people whose only objective is the sale, there is nothing adjacent to measure it against, and the decision gets made entirely inside their framing. Set four products from one shelf beside each other and sort them by what they physically do, and the choice becomes tractable. Occasionally the answer turns out to be none of them, and a site unwilling to reach that conclusion is not worth reading.

How things end up here

A product gets covered because it sits in a category people are already searching. What it pays plays no role in that selection, and none in how it is written up afterwards. Ingredient lists, package structures and refund terms come from each seller's own pages, carrying the month they were verified.

Every product gets a whole page rather than a slot in a grid. A supplement is judged on its label and its pricing structure, and compressing either into two lines removes precisely the part that would have helped you.

Where the money comes from

Affiliate commission, paid by the merchant from their margin when somebody buys through a link here. Your price is identical whether you use the link or type the address yourself. That is the whole arrangement and it appears on every page rather than in a footnote.

The fair objection is that a site paid on sales has every reason to push them. Quite so. What stands against it is method rather than assurance: published arithmetic that sometimes contradicts the seller's own discount banner, guide pages carrying no prices whatsoever, and a flat refusal to publish ratings. Judge the output.

Things this site will not print

Getting it wrong

Prices move and errors happen. Anything inaccurate here can be reported through the contact page, and it gets corrected rather than quietly left in place.